Main Article Content
Purpose- In this paper, we have evaluated the relationship of corporate governance with companies’ financial returns using return on assets (ROA) and return on capital employed (ROCE) as proxies. For this purpose, companies listed in Nifty-50 are considered as a sample.
Design/Methodology- The present study is conducted on the NIFTY-50 Index with a final sample of 35 companies after excluding banking companies, financial services companies, and companies that did not have the required data in the sample period. Data has been collected for ten years from 2009-10 to 2018-19, and they are analyzed with the help of software packages such as SPSS and Stata.
Findings- The results showed that firms’ financial return measures (ROA and ROCE) were significantly affected by governance measures, board committees, and CEO duality. Board size, board meetings, and board independence did show positive relation, but it was not significant. Our analysis observed that corporate governance significantly affected the financial return of Indian listed companies.
Practical Implications- Our research work indicated the importance of corporate governance in generating financial returns for Indian listed companies. CEO duality is found to be increasing the ROCE of listed companies in India, and therefore investors should choose such companies where the CEO plays a dual role in the board. Also, policymakers should take into consideration the dual role of CEOs while making changes in company regulations.
Abdul Gafoor, C. P., Mariappan, V., & Thyagarajan, S. (2018). Board characteristics and bank performance in India. IIMB Management Review, 30(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.01.007
Belkhir, M. (2009). Board of directors’ size and performance in the banking industry. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910947903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910947903
Borlea, S. N., Achim, M. V., & Mare, C. (2017). Board characteristics and firm performances in emerging economies. Lessons from Romania. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 30(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1291359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1291359
Dey, D. K., & Chauhan, Y. K. (2009). Board composition and performance in Indian firms : A comparison. The Icfai University Journal of Corporate Governance, 8(2), 7–19.
Dwivedi, N., & Jain, A. K. (2005). Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: The effect of board size and ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-6939-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-6939-5
Ghosh, S. (2006). Do board characteristics affect corporate performance? Firm-level evidence for India. Applied Economics Letters, 13(7), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500398617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500398617
Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470802466121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470802466121
Kathuria, V., & Dash, S. (1999). Board size and corporate financial performance: An investigation. Vikalpa, 24(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919990303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919990303
Kaur, A., & Singh, B. (2018). Corporate Reputation: Do Board Characteristics Matter? Indian Evidence. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686218797758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686218797758
Kiranmai, J., & Mishra, R. K. (2019). Corporate Governance Practices in Listed State-owned Enterprises in India: An Empirical Research. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(1), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686219849760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686219849760
Kota, H. B., & Tomar, S. (2010). Corporate governance practices in Indian firms. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1833367200002170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200002170
Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2012). Outside Directors, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(2), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v4i2.1737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v4i2.1737
Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: Some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 13(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311302431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311302431
Merendino, A., & Melville, R. (2019). The board of directors and firm performance: empirical evidence from listed companies. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 19(3), 508–551. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2018-0211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2018-0211
Mishra, R. K., & Kapil, S. (2018). Board characteristics and firm value for Indian companies. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-07-2016-0074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-07-2016-0074
Palaniappan, G. (2017). Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to board characteristics of corporate governance in Indian manufacturing industry: An empirical study. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-005
Roudaki, J. (2018). Corporate governance structures and firm performance in large agriculture companies in New Zealand. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(5), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2018-0241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2018-0241
Singh, S., Tabassum, N., Darwish, T. K., & Batsakis, G. (2018). Corporate Governance and Tobin’s Q as a Measure of Organizational Performance. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12237
Tanna, S., Pasiouras, F., & Nnadi, M. (2011). The Effect of Board Size and Composition on the Efficiency of UK Banks. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 18(3), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2011.618617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2011.618617
Waheed, A., & Malik, Q. A. (2019). Board characteristics, ownership concentration and firms’ performance: A contingent theoretical based approach. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 8(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-03-2018-0031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-03-2018-0031
Yang, T., & Zhao, S. (2014). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment. Journal of Banking and Finance, 49, 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.008
Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S., & Maggina, A. (2018). Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002