From Readiness to Performance: Modelling AI-Enabled HR Analytics Adoption Capability as a Second-Order Formative Construct in Nigerian SMEs

Authors

Michael Raphael Onenyi  1 , Peter Ugbedeojo Nelson  2 , Muhammed Idris Ogbike  3
Department of Business Administration, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba, Nigeria 1 , Department of Business Administration, Federal University Lokoja, Nigeria 2 , Department of Business Administration, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba, Nigeria 3
“crossref”/
Views: 0  
Downloads: 0  

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: This study examines how AI-enabled HR Analytics Adoption Capability (AIHRA), a second-order formative construct, is associated with operational performance among Nigerian SMEs.
Design: Drawing on UTAUT2, the Resource-Based View, and Socio-Technical Systems Theory, a survey was administered to 296 respondents across SMEs in Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt, and Kano. PLS-SEM via SmartPLS 4.0.9.9 was used for analysis.
Findings: Technological Readiness (weight = 0.584, p<0.001) and Organisational Support (weight = 0.532, p<0.001) significantly form AIHRA. Perceived Value and Use is non-significant (0.119, p = 0.219) but shows absolute importance. AIHRA is positively associated with operational performance (β = 0.626, R2 = 0.392).
Policy Implications: Managers and policymakers should prioritise digital infrastructure and organisational support before AI procurement.
Originality: This study contributes an empirically tested higher-order formative model linking AI-HR analytics adoption capability to operational performance in Nigerian SMEs, extending prior technology-organisation-environment evidence by showing structural determinants dominate perceptual constructs within a multi-theory, capability-based specification.

Article Details

Onenyi, M. R., Nelson, P. U., & Ogbike, M. I. . (2026). From Readiness to Performance: Modelling AI-Enabled HR Analytics Adoption Capability as a Second-Order Formative Construct in Nigerian SMEs. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 9(1), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.33215/ys2h9974
Business & Management

Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Raphael Onenyi, Peter Ugbedeojo Nelson, Muhammed Idris Ogbike

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Michael Raphael Onenyi, Department of Business Administration, Prince Abubakar Audu University, Anyigba, Nigeria

 

 

The data used in this study are not publicly available due to confidentiality agreements with participating organizations but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Alvarez-Gutierrez, F. J., Stone, D. L., Castano, A. M., & Garcia-Izquierdo, A. L. (2022). Human resources analytics: A systematic review from a sustainable management approach. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 38(3), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2022a18

Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, C. F., De Arroyabe, I. F., & De Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2024). Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: A study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment. Technology in Society, 79, 102733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102733

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Becker, J., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical Latent Variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using Reflective-Formative Type Models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001

Bonilla-Chaves, E. F., Palos-Sanchez, P. R., Folgado-Fernandez, J. A., & Marino-Romero, J. A. (2024). The effect of innovation performance on the adoption of HR analytics. Electronic Research Archive, 32(2), 1126-1144. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2024054

Coltman, T., Devinney, T. M., Midgley, D. F., & Venaik, S. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1250-1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.013

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845

Ebuka, A. A., Emmanuel, D., & Idigo, P. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a catalyst for the sustainability of SMEs in Nigeria. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v5i1.1719

Ekka, S., & Singh, P. (2022). Predicting HR professionals adoption of HR analytics: An extension of UTAUT model. Organizacija, 55(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2022-0006

Faiz, F., Le, V., & Masli, E. K. (2024). Determinants of digital technology adoption in innovative SMEs. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(4), 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100610

Faruk, O. M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in business intelligence. 1st Global Research and Innovation Conference, 01(01), 589-617.

Giermindl, L. M., Strich, F., Christ, O., Leicht-Deobald, U., & Redzepi, A. (2021). The dark sides of people analytics. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 410-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927213

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on PLS-SEM (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on PLS-SEM (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based SEM. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319.

Hult, G. T. M., Hair, J. F., Proksch, D., Sarstedt, M., Pinkwart, A., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.17.0151

Hussain, S., Khan, A., & Ahmed, M. (2024). Strategic AI adoption in SMEs: A prescriptive framework. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2408.11825

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101

Marler, J. H., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244699

National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). SMEs in Nigeria: A report on the small and medium enterprise sector. Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Pasmore, W. A. (1988). Designing effective organisations. Wiley.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Raza, H., Arif, S., Luhana, K. K., & Mushtaq, A. (2025). The impact of AI-BA opacity on operational inefficiency. Social Science Review Archives, 3(3), 624-637. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i3.893

Razali, N. and Wah, Y. (2011) Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(10, 21-33.

Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modelling as analytical method. European Management Journal, 34, 598-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.006

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS GmbH.

Sadiq, O., Hack-Polay, D., Fuller, T., & Rahman, M. (2022). Barriers to the Effective Integration of Developed ICT for SMEs in Rural NIGERIA. Businesses, 2(4), 501-526. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses2040032

Samson, K., & Bhanugopan, R. (2022). Strategic human capital analytics and organisation performance: The mediating effects of managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Research, 144, 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.044

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J., Becker, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business (7th ed.). Wiley.

Shadrach, M., & Umemezia, E. (2025). Adoption of HRIS among SMEs in Nigeria: A review. Nigerian Journal of Management Sciences, 26(1a).

Shahadat, M. M. H., Nekmahmud, M., Ebrahimi, P., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2023). Digital technology adoption in SMES: What technological, environmental and organizational factors influence in emerging countries? Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221137199

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-02-2019-0189

SMEDAN. (2013). SMEDAN and National Bureau of Statistics collaborative survey.

Tanantong, T., & Wongras, P. (2024). A UTAUT-Based Framework for Analyzing Users’ Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Recruitment: A Case Study of Thailand. Systems, 12(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12010028

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.

Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method. Human Relations, 4(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101

Venkatesh, V. (2021). Adoption and use of AI tools: A research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1-2), 641-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Wang, L., Zhou, Y., Sanders, K., Marler, J. H., & Zou, Y. (2023). Determinants of effective HR analytics implementation. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114312

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207

Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The UTAUT in higher education: A systematic review. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570

Zhang, P., Dillard, N., & Cavallo, T. (2025). Navigating the limitations of algorithmic management: STS Theory and Strategic HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 24(3), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251320252