Research Articles Open access Double-blind peer reviewed

Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Returns of Indian Listed Companies

Authors

  • Dr. Sanjeeb Kumar DeyORCID iD verified by the author (show author details)

    Dr. Sanjeeb Kumar Dey

    Department of Commerce, Ravenshaw University, Odisha, India, India

    • Debabrata SharmaORCID iD verified by the author (show author details)

      Debabrata Sharma

      Institute of Management and Information Technology, Odisha, India, India

      Corresponding author

      Cite

      How to Cite

      Dey, S. K., & Sharma, D. (2021). Impact of Corporate Governance on Financial Returns of Indian Listed Companies. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 4(4), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v4i4.717

      More Citation Formats

      Download Citation

      Share
      • 1,247views
      • 1,025downloads

      Abstract

      Purpose- In this paper, we have evaluated the relationship of corporate governance with companies’ financial returns using return on assets (ROA) and return on capital employed (ROCE) as proxies. For this purpose, companies listed in Nifty-50 are considered as a sample.

      Design/Methodology- The present study is conducted on the NIFTY-50 Index with a final sample of 35 companies after excluding banking companies, financial services companies, and companies that did not have the required data in the sample period.  Data has been collected for ten years from 2009-10 to 2018-19, and they are analyzed with the help of software packages such as SPSS and Stata.

      Findings- The results showed that firms’ financial return measures (ROA and ROCE) were significantly affected by governance measures, board committees, and CEO duality. Board size, board meetings, and board independence did show positive relation, but it was not significant. Our analysis observed that corporate governance significantly affected the financial return of Indian listed companies.

      Practical Implications- Our research work indicated the importance of corporate governance in generating financial returns for Indian listed companies.  CEO duality is found to be increasing the ROCE of listed companies in India, and therefore investors should choose such companies where the CEO plays a dual role in the board. Also, policymakers should take into consideration the dual role of CEOs while making changes in company regulations.

      Keywords

      Categories

      Reads, last 12 months

      2025-122026-11

      Article history

      1. ReceivedSeptember 4, 2021
      2. AcceptedOctober 22, 2021
      3. Published October 26, 2021

      References

      Abdul Gafoor, C. P., Mariappan, V., & Thyagarajan, S. (2018). Board characteristics and bank performance in India. IIMB Management Review, 30(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.01.007 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Belkhir, M. (2009). Board of directors’ size and performance in the banking industry. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910947903 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Borlea, S. N., Achim, M. V., & Mare, C. (2017). Board characteristics and firm performances in emerging economies. Lessons from Romania. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 30(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1291359 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Dey, D. K., & Chauhan, Y. K. (2009). Board composition and performance in Indian firms : A comparison. The Icfai University Journal of Corporate Governance, 8(2), 7–19.

      Dwivedi, N., & Jain, A. K. (2005). Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: The effect of board size and ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-6939-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Ghosh, S. (2006). Do board characteristics affect corporate performance? Firm-level evidence for India. Applied Economics Letters, 13(7), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500398617 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470802466121 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Kathuria, V., & Dash, S. (1999). Board size and corporate financial performance: An investigation. Vikalpa, 24(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919990303 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Kaur, A., & Singh, B. (2018). Corporate Reputation: Do Board Characteristics Matter? Indian Evidence. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686218797758 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Kiranmai, J., & Mishra, R. K. (2019). Corporate Governance Practices in Listed State-owned Enterprises in India: An Empirical Research. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(1), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686219849760 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Kota, H. B., & Tomar, S. (2010). Corporate governance practices in Indian firms. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1833367200002170 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2012). Outside Directors, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(2), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v4i2.1737 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: Some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 13(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311302431 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Merendino, A., & Melville, R. (2019). The board of directors and firm performance: empirical evidence from listed companies. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 19(3), 508–551. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2018-0211 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Mishra, R. K., & Kapil, S. (2018). Board characteristics and firm value for Indian companies. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-07-2016-0074 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Palaniappan, G. (2017). Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to board characteristics of corporate governance in Indian manufacturing industry: An empirical study. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Roudaki, J. (2018). Corporate governance structures and firm performance in large agriculture companies in New Zealand. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(5), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2018-0241 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Singh, S., Tabassum, N., Darwish, T. K., & Batsakis, G. (2018). Corporate Governance and Tobin’s Q as a Measure of Organizational Performance. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12237 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Tanna, S., Pasiouras, F., & Nnadi, M. (2011). The Effect of Board Size and Composition on the Efficiency of UK Banks. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 18(3), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2011.618617 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Waheed, A., & Malik, Q. A. (2019). Board characteristics, ownership concentration and firms’ performance: A contingent theoretical based approach. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 8(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-03-2018-0031 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Yang, T., & Zhao, S. (2014). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment. Journal of Banking and Finance, 49, 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S., & Maggina, A. (2018). Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

      Similar articles

      Chosen by the keywords and the section they share with this article.