Evaluating the Heterogeneous Effect of Firm Risk on Firm Value

Authors

Financial Services Analytics, Alfred Lerner College of Business & Economics, University of Delaware, USA 1
“crossref”/
Views: 1170  
Downloads: 854  

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose- This paper aims to investigate the effect of firm risk on the firm value to see how the firm value is changing when the risk level is changed. Our result indicates that a higher level of risk can reduce firm value. 


Design/Methodology- We apply a Bayesian causal technique for a sample data set of US public firms. The causal approach helps us to focus on the reliable and unbiased results instead of the association-based findings.


Findings- The results show a negative effect of risk on the firms’ value for the sample data. However, we investigate the potential effect of the risk across the distribution of the firm value. We witness the more substantial effect of risk on firms with a higher value.


Practical Implications- Helps firms to evaluate their risk and its effect, so they can adjust their decisions and take actions to reduce the undesired effects of firm risk.

Article Details

Nhung Nguyen, T. H. (2020). Evaluating the Heterogeneous Effect of Firm Risk on Firm Value. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 3(5), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v3i5.430
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The journal of finance, 23(4), 589-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross‐section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The quarterly journal of economics, 116(1), 1-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556310 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bettis, R. A., & Hall, W. K. (1982). Diversification strategy, accounting determined risk, and accounting determined return. Academy of Management journal, 25(2), 254-264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bitler, M. P., Gelbach, J. B., & Hoynes, H. W. (2006). What mean impacts miss: Distributional effects of welfare reform experiments. American Economic Review, 96(4), 988-1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.4.988 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, E. H. (1980). A risk/return paradox for strategic management.

Chang, C.-S., Yu, S.-W., & Hung, C.-H. (2015). Firm risk and performance: the role of corporate governance. Review of Managerial Science, 9(1), 141-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0132-x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Chari, M. D., David, P., Duru, A., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Bowman's risk-return paradox: An agency theory perspective. Journal of Business Research, 95, 357-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Chi, J. D., & Su, X. (2017). The dynamics of performance volatility and firm valuation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(1), 111-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109016000788 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Faraji, Z. (2020). The Causal Analysis of Financial Distress Risk and Performance. American International Journal of Business Management, 3(5), 5.

Faraji, Z., & Fleischhacker, A. (2020). Overstatement of firm diversification effect on bankruptcy risk reduction. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 13(3), 267-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2020.108496 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, R. D., & Pathak, R. (2018). Firm’s Risk-Return Association Facets and Prospect Theory Findings—An Emerging versus Developed Country Context. Risks, 6(4), 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6040143 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2010). Causal inference: CRC Boca Raton, FL;.

Koenker. (2005). Quantile Regression (Econometric Society Monographs; No. 38): Cambridge university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Lee, B. S., & Li, M.-Y. L. (2012). Diversification and risk-adjusted performance: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(7), 2157-2173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.03.020 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Pástor, Ľ., & Pietro, V. (2003). Stock valuation and learning about profitability. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1749-1789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00587 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Rountree, B., Weston, J. P., & Allayannis, G. (2008). Do investors value smooth performance? Journal of Financial Economics, 90(3), 237-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.02.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 322-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000001880 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of business, 39(1), 119-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/294846 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Shin, H.-H., & Stulz, R. M. (2000). Firm value, risk, and growth opportunities: National bureau of economic research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w7808 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Yang, P., Riepe, J., Moser, K., Pull, K., & Terjesen, S. (2019). Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.05.004 CrossrefGoogle Scholar