Does Structural Power Matter? Board Attributes and Firm Performance Moderated by CEO Duality

Main Article Content

Fiona Jepkosgei Korir
Joel K. Tenai


Purpose- The study investigates the moderating role of Chief Executive Officer Duality onboard attributes and firm performance of companies listed in Kenya.

Design/Methodology- The research used a longitudinal research design. Panel data were derived from published accounts for sixteen years that is from 2002-2017. IGLS regression models were used to test the hypothesis.

Findings- The empirical results indicated that the independence of the board, the size of the board, and the duration in which the board member served the organization positively influence the firm performance. However, CEO duality does not moderate the relationship.

Practical Implications- Regulatory bodies such as NSE and CMA in Kenya should ensure that listed firms have more independent directors serving a board, ensure a reasonable size of the board and increase the board tenure to enhance firm performance. Further, the combined roles of the CEO and chairman may not influence the efficiency of the board in the Kenyan context.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Korir, F. J., & Tenai, J. K. (2020). Does Structural Power Matter? Board Attributes and Firm Performance: Moderated by CEO Duality. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 3(5), 54–64.
Accounting & Finance


Adams, M., & Jiang, W. (2020). Do financial experts on the board matter? An empirical test from the United Kingdom’s non-life insurance industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 35(1), 168-195. DOI:

Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Faudziah, H. B. F. (2014). The effect of the relationship between board of directors characteristics on firm performance in Oman: empirical study. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(3), 556-574.

Amaoko, G., & Goh, M. (2015). Corporate governance practices of state-owned enterprises in Ghana. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 14(2), 44-63.

Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic management journal, 16(4), 301-312. DOI:

Buallay, A., Hamdan, A., & Zureigat, Q. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), 78-98. DOI:

Chan, A. M. Y., Liu, G., & Sun, J. (2013). Independent audit committee members’ board tenure and audit fees. Accounting & Finance, 53(4), 1129-1147. DOI:

Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., Demirbag, M., & Zaim, S. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28(1), 90-103. DOI:

Duru, A., Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2016). The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4269-4277. DOI:

Fernandes, C., Farinha, J., Martins, F. V., & Mateus, C. (2017). Supervisory boards, financial crisis and bank performance: do board characteristics matter? Journal of banking regulation, 18(4), 310-337. DOI:

Garkaz, M., Abdollahi, A., Niknam, S., & Branch, G. (2016). Studying the Effect of the Board Characteristics on the Timeliness of Financial Reporting of Listed Companies In Tehran Stock exchange. International Journal of New Studies in Management Research, 1(1), 32-37.

Han, S., Nanda, V. K., & Silveri, S. (2016). CEO power and firm performance under pressure. Financial Management, 45(2), 369-400. DOI:

Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 641-660. DOI:

Hoppmann, J., Naegele, F., & Girod, B. (2019). Boards as a source of inertia: Examining the internal challenges and dynamics of boards of directors in times of environmental discontinuities. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 437-468. DOI:

Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. the Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880. DOI:

Kalsie, A., & Shrivastav, S. M. (2016). Analysis of board size and firm performance: evidence from NSE companies using panel data approach. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 9(2), 148-172. DOI:

Kao, M.-F., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 1(2), 123-141. DOI:

Katti, S., & Raithatha, M. (2018). Governance practices and agency cost in emerging market: Evidence from India. Managerial and Decision Economics, 39(6), 712-732. DOI:

Kim, K.-H., Al-Shammari, H. A., Kim, B., & Lee, S.-H. (2009). CEO duality leadership and corporate diversification behavior. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1173-1180. DOI:

Klettner, A., Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2014). The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 145-165. DOI:

Lamb, N. H. (2017). Does the number of interlocking directors influence a firm’s financial performance? An exploratory meta-analysis. American Journal of Management, 17(2), 47-57.

Li, F. (2016). Endogeneity in CEO power: A survey and experiment. Investment Analysts Journal, 45(3), 149-162. DOI:

Martín, C., & Herrero, B. (2018). Boards of directors: composition and effects on the performance of the firm. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 31(1), 1015-1041. DOI:

Merendino, A., & Sarens, G. (2020). Crisis? What crisis? Exploring the cognitive constraints on boards of directors in times of uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 118(2), 415-430. DOI:

Naseem, M. A., Xiaoming, S., Riaz, S., & Rehman, R. U. (2017). Board attributes and financial performance: the evidence from an emerging economy. The journal of developing areas, 51(3), 281-297. DOI:

Neville, F., Byron, K., Post, C., & Ward, A. (2019). Board independence and corporate misconduct: A cross-national meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2538-2569. DOI:

Ntim, C. G. (2016). Corporate governance, corporate health accounting, and firm value: The case of HIV/AIDS disclosures in Sub-Saharan Africa. The International Journal of Accounting, 51(2), 155-216. DOI:

Oteng-Abayie, E. F., Affram, A., & Mensah, H. K. (2018). Corporate governance and efficiency of rural and community banks (RCBs) in Ghana. Econometric Research in Finance, 3(2), 93-118. DOI:

Pervin, R., & Rashid, M. M. (2019). Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from Listed Banking Institutions of Bangladesh. The cost and management, XLVII, 1, 3-10.

Sadeghi Panah, J., & Boroumand, R. (2015). Relationship between Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science (IJASHSS), 4(2), 102-117.

Saleh, M. W., Latif, R. A., Bakar, F. A., & Maigoshi, Z. S. (2020). The impact of multiple directorships, board characteristics, and ownership on the performance of Palestinian listed companies. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 16(1), 63-80. DOI:

Sarhan, A. A., Ntim, C. G., & Al‐Najjar, B. (2019). Board diversity, corporate governance, corporate performance, and executive pay. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(2), 761-786. DOI:

Sheikh, M. F., Shah, S. Z. A., & Akbar, S. (2018). Firm performance, corporate governance and executive compensation in Pakistan. Applied economics, 50(18), 2012-2027. DOI:

Smulowitz, S., Becerra, M., & Mayo, M. (2019). Racial diversity and its asymmetry within and across hierarchical levels: The effects on financial performance. Human Relations, 72(10), 1671-1696. DOI:

Subedi, S. D. (2018). Role of Corporate Governance on the Performance of Insurance Companies of Nepal. Journal of Business and Social Sciences Research, 3(2), 151-164. DOI:

Tang, J. (2017). CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and blockholding outside directors. European Management Journal, 35(3), 362-372. DOI: