Evaluating the Heterogeneous Effect of Firm Risk on Firm Value

Main Article Content

Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-0536

Abstract

Purpose- This paper aims to investigate the effect of firm risk on the firm value to see how the firm value is changing when the risk level is changed. Our result indicates that a higher level of risk can reduce firm value. 


Design/Methodology- We apply a Bayesian causal technique for a sample data set of US public firms. The causal approach helps us to focus on the reliable and unbiased results instead of the association-based findings.


Findings- The results show a negative effect of risk on the firms’ value for the sample data. However, we investigate the potential effect of the risk across the distribution of the firm value. We witness the more substantial effect of risk on firms with a higher value.


Practical Implications- Helps firms to evaluate their risk and its effect, so they can adjust their decisions and take actions to reduce the undesired effects of firm risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nhung Nguyen, T. H. (2020). Evaluating the Heterogeneous Effect of Firm Risk on Firm Value. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 3(5), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v3i5.430
Section
Accounting & Finance

References

Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The journal of finance, 23(4), 589-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x

Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross‐section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x

Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The quarterly journal of economics, 116(1), 1-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556310

Bettis, R. A., & Hall, W. K. (1982). Diversification strategy, accounting determined risk, and accounting determined return. Academy of Management journal, 25(2), 254-264.

Bitler, M. P., Gelbach, J. B., & Hoynes, H. W. (2006). What mean impacts miss: Distributional effects of welfare reform experiments. American Economic Review, 96(4), 988-1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.4.988

Bowman, E. H. (1980). A risk/return paradox for strategic management.

Chang, C.-S., Yu, S.-W., & Hung, C.-H. (2015). Firm risk and performance: the role of corporate governance. Review of Managerial Science, 9(1), 141-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0132-x

Chari, M. D., David, P., Duru, A., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Bowman's risk-return paradox: An agency theory perspective. Journal of Business Research, 95, 357-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.010

Chi, J. D., & Su, X. (2017). The dynamics of performance volatility and firm valuation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(1), 111-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109016000788

Faraji, Z. (2020). The Causal Analysis of Financial Distress Risk and Performance. American International Journal of Business Management, 3(5), 5.

Faraji, Z., & Fleischhacker, A. (2020). Overstatement of firm diversification effect on bankruptcy risk reduction. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 13(3), 267-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2020.108496

Gupta, R. D., & Pathak, R. (2018). Firm’s Risk-Return Association Facets and Prospect Theory Findings—An Emerging versus Developed Country Context. Risks, 6(4), 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6040143

Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2010). Causal inference: CRC Boca Raton, FL;.

Koenker. (2005). Quantile Regression (Econometric Society Monographs; No. 38): Cambridge university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098

Lee, B. S., & Li, M.-Y. L. (2012). Diversification and risk-adjusted performance: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(7), 2157-2173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.03.020

Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x

Pástor, Ľ., & Pietro, V. (2003). Stock valuation and learning about profitability. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1749-1789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00587

Rountree, B., Weston, J. P., & Allayannis, G. (2008). Do investors value smooth performance? Journal of Financial Economics, 90(3), 237-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.02.002

Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 322-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000001880

Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of business, 39(1), 119-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/294846

Shin, H.-H., & Stulz, R. M. (2000). Firm value, risk, and growth opportunities: National bureau of economic research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w7808

Yang, P., Riepe, J., Moser, K., Pull, K., & Terjesen, S. (2019). Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.05.004