Programming Ethics in Self-Driving Cars: Ethical Dilemma
Self-driving cars promise to revolutionize the automotive industry. Besides being productive and fuel-efficient, they would be significantly safer than the human-operated cars. However, in the rare case when they do get into an accident, they can calculate and opt for the reactive measure to take based on their programming. The manufacturer, it seems, must decide the ethics that self-driving cars should follow in such scenarios. In circumstances where they must choose between the lives of the passengers and the pedestrians, some researchers have argued that the best solution is to choose for the safety of the passengers over the pedestrians. Such a strategy, they argue will make sense as cars will have better control over the passenger and, therefore, will help in faster adoption of self-driving cars. However, this line of thinking seems simplistic at best. The author suggests areexamination of the ethical issues while taking into account the social and technological aspects as well.
Ackerman, E. (2016). People want driverless cars with utilitarian ethics, unless they're a passenger. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/self-driving/people-want-driverless-cars-with-utilitarian-ethics-unless-theyre-a-passenger
Bell, L. (n.d.). 10 benefits of self-driving cars. Autobytel.com. Retrieved November 26, 2016, from http://www.autobytel.com/car-ownership/advice/10-benefits-of-self-driving-cars-121032/
Birnbacher, D., & Birnbacher, W. (2017). Fully autonomous driving: Where technology and ethics meet. IEEE Intelligent Systems. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8070891/
Bonnefon, J., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). Why self-driving cars must be programmed to kill. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/542626/why-self-driving-cars-must-be-programmed-to-kill/
Brown, M. (2016). Mercedes-Benz's self-driving car will kill pedestrians over drivers. Inverse. Retrieved from https://www.inverse.com/article/22204-mercedes-benz-self-driving-cars-ai-ethics
Foot, Philippa, 1967. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect.” Oxford Review 5:5-15.
Greenemeier, L. (2016). Driverless cars will face moral dilemmas. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/driverless-cars-will-face-moral-dilemmas/
JafariNaimi, N. (2018). Our bodies in the Trolley’s path, or why self-driving cars must *Not* be programmed to kill. Science, Technology & Human Values. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0162243917718942
Mearian, L. (2013). Self-driving cars could save more than 21,700 lives, $450B a year. Computerworld. Retrieved from http://www.computerworld.com/article/2486635/emerging-technology/self-driving-cars-could-save-more-than-21-700-lives-450b-a-year.html
Scheutz, M. (2017). The case for explicit ethical agents. AI Magazine. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1987346634?accountid=44888
Stewart, J. (2016). Elon Musk promises self-driving autonomous Tesla Motors cars by the end of 2017. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2016/10/elon-musk-says-every-new-tesla-can-drive/?mbid=social_fb
Copyright (c) 2018 Najam Ul Hassan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.