Scale and Skill in Mutual Fund Management: Evidence from Norway

Main Article Content

Markus Snøve Høiberg
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9997-091X

Abstract

Using a sample free of survivorship bias and several risk-adjusted performance benchmarks to identify effects of scale on mutual fund performance in the Norwegian market, I find mixed evidence that both large and small funds underperform as against the middle-sized funds in the period 2005-2018. Controlling for relevant factors in panel data regressions, I find that, on average, performance worsens with an increase in size while giving support to initial findings of nonlinearity. The relationship is most robust after 2013 and seems to be affected by competition in the market as well as fund inflows. I do not find any empirical evidence to support the liquidity hypothesis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Høiberg, M. S. . (2020). Scale and Skill in Mutual Fund Management: Evidence from Norway. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 3(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v3i4.351
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Snøve Høiberg

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Bank, N. (2019, February 1). Norges-Bank.no. Retrieved from https://www.norges-bank.no/en/Statistics/Historical-monetary-statistics/Short-term-interest-rates/

Børs, O. (2018, February 1). Statistikk. Retrieved from https://www.oslobors.no/Oslo-Boers/Statistikk

Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x

Chen, H.-l., & Pennacchi, G. G. (2009). Does prior performance affect a mutual fund’s choice of risk? Theory and further empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis, 44(4), 745-775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002210900999010X

Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. D. (2004). Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization. The American Economic Review, 94(5), 1276-1302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828043052277

DNB. (2019, March 09). Vi har satt ned prisene på de fleste av våre fond. Retrieved from https://www.dnb.no/privat/sparing-og-investering/fond/ny-prismodell.html

EuropeanParliament. (2014). Council of the European Union. (2014). Directive COD 2012/0168, EEA relevance, Com 2012/0350. https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=2012/0168%28COD%29&l=en.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2010). Luck versus Skill in the Cross-Section of Mutual Fund Returns. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1915-1947. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01598.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01598.x

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2017). International tests of a five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 441-463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.11.004

Feldman, D., Saxena, K., & Xu, J. (2020). Is the active fund management industry concentrated enough? Journal of Financial Economics, 136(1), 23-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.08.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.08.009

Ferreira, M. A., Keswani, A., Miguel, A. F., Ramos, S. B. J. J. o. B., & Finance. (2012). The flow-performance relationship around the world. 36(6), 1759-1780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.019

Gruber, M. J. (1996). Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds. The Journal of Finance, 51(3), 783-810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb02707.x

Indro, D. C., Jiang, C. X., Hu, M. Y., & Lee, W. Y. (1999). Mutual Fund Performance: Does Fund Size Matter? Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 74-87. doi:10.2469/faj.v55.n3.2274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n3.2274

Jensen, M. C. (1968). The Performance of Mutual Funds in the period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00815.x

Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2015). Scale and skill in active management. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 23-45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.11.008

Perold, A. F., & Robert S. Salomon, Jr. (1991). The Right Amount of Assets under Management. Financial Analysts Journal, 47(3), 31-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v47.n3.31

Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3), 341-360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6

Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika Vol. 52, No.3/4, 591-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591

Sharpe, W. F. (1964). CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x

Treynor, J. L. (1962). Toward a Theory of Market Value of Risky Assets. doi:Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=628187 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.628187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.628187

Treynor, J. L., & Black, F. (1973). How to Use Security Analysis to Improve Portfolio Selection. Journal of Business, 46, 66-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/295508

VFF. (2018). Historikk Totalmarkedet (2005-2018). Retrieved from

Yan, X. S. J. J. o. F., & Analysis, Q. (2008). Liquidity, investment style, and the relation between fund size and fund performance. 43(3), 741-767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004270